Comments on: Office 2.0 Interoperability http://itredux.com/2006/02/10/office-20-interoperability/ New Rules for a New IT World Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:55:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta3 hourly 1 By: Ismael Ghalimi http://itredux.com/2006/02/10/office-20-interoperability/comment-page-1/#comment-10531 Ismael Ghalimi Wed, 06 Sep 2006 19:30:31 +0000 http://itredux.com/blog/2006/02/10/office-20-interoperability/#comment-10531 Chris, Could I? I would have to install some software, which I don't want to. Chris,

Could I? I would have to install some software, which I don’t want to.

]]> By: Chris Poteet http://itredux.com/2006/02/10/office-20-interoperability/comment-page-1/#comment-10423 Chris Poteet Tue, 05 Sep 2006 18:51:37 +0000 http://itredux.com/blog/2006/02/10/office-20-interoperability/#comment-10423 You could use <a href="http://www.roboform.com/" rel="nofollow">Roboform</a>. You could use Roboform.

]]> By: Ismael Ghalimi http://itredux.com/2006/02/10/office-20-interoperability/comment-page-1/#comment-367 Ismael Ghalimi Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:04:59 +0000 http://itredux.com/blog/2006/02/10/office-20-interoperability/#comment-367 Well, let's work on it then. Well, let’s work on it then.

]]> By: Alan Wilensky http://itredux.com/2006/02/10/office-20-interoperability/comment-page-1/#comment-366 Alan Wilensky Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:56:35 +0000 http://itredux.com/blog/2006/02/10/office-20-interoperability/#comment-366 I feel we are a long way from this ideal. I feel we are a long way from this ideal.

]]> By: Alan Wilensky http://itredux.com/2006/02/10/office-20-interoperability/comment-page-1/#comment-365 Alan Wilensky Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:55:16 +0000 http://itredux.com/blog/2006/02/10/office-20-interoperability/#comment-365 The Year of the Web Application Framework and Java Defections... The Year of the Web Application Framework and Java Defections…

]]> By: IT|Redux » Office 2.0 Bug Tracker http://itredux.com/2006/02/10/office-20-interoperability/comment-page-1/#comment-364 IT|Redux » Office 2.0 Bug Tracker Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:38:01 +0000 http://itredux.com/blog/2006/02/10/office-20-interoperability/#comment-364 [...] Office 2.0 does not support custom branding [Added on February 12, 2006]Granted, most services will let you put your logo somewhere on the screen and chance fonts and colors here and there, but beyond that, service branding remains a luxury that most of us cannot afford. The first issue to be solved is with domain names, as described in this article. Services should be offered through an organization’s own domain name, instead of a generic one. For example, I would like to use Basecamp through a URL that looks like projects.itredux.com, instead of the backward itredux.projectpath.com. Google has started to address this issue, therefore I expect it to be fixed for most services before the end of the year. [...] […] Office 2.0 does not support custom branding [Added on February 12, 2006]Granted, most services will let you put your logo somewhere on the screen and chance fonts and colors here and there, but beyond that, service branding remains a luxury that most of us cannot afford. The first issue to be solved is with domain names, as described in this article. Services should be offered through an organization’s own domain name, instead of a generic one. For example, I would like to use Basecamp through a URL that looks like projects.itredux.com, instead of the backward itredux.projectpath.com. Google has started to address this issue, therefore I expect it to be fixed for most services before the end of the year. […]

]]>