<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Office 2.0 Directory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itredux.com/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itredux.com/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/</link>
	<description>New Rules for a New IT World</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vator.tv Competition</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/comment-page-1/#comment-273073</link>
		<dc:creator>vator.tv Competition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/#comment-273073</guid>
		<description>[...] The Office 2.0 Database was created in March of last year, and references over 650 applications today. This means that we have been adding an average of about 1.4 applications every day. With such a deluge of options, identifying the most promising applications is becoming quite a challenge, and we need a better way for vendors to pitch their wares. Here comes vator.tv, an online pitching service recently created by a friend of mine. Vator.tv lets you upload your video pitch for an idea &#8212; any idea &#8212; and join competitions that receive the participation of industry analysts, press people, and venture capitalists. In a nutshell, it&#8217;s YouTube for pitches. [Continue&#8230;] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Office 2.0 Database was created in March of last year, and references over 650 applications today. This means that we have been adding an average of about 1.4 applications every day. With such a deluge of options, identifying the most promising applications is becoming quite a challenge, and we need a better way for vendors to pitch their wares. Here comes vator.tv, an online pitching service recently created by a friend of mine. Vator.tv lets you upload your video pitch for an idea&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;any idea&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;and join competitions that receive the participation of industry analysts, press people, and venture capitalists. In a nutshell, it&#8217;s YouTube for pitches. [Continue&#8230;]&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT&#124;Redux - Office 2.0 Database Redux</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/comment-page-1/#comment-55961</link>
		<dc:creator>IT&#124;Redux - Office 2.0 Database Redux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/#comment-55961</guid>
		<description>[...] The Office 2.0 Database created almost a year ago now contains over 450 applications, which have been submitted by more than 150 contributors. It started as a single page separate from the core IT&#124;Redux blog, then evolved into a collection of pages, but did not offer the ability for readers to write reviews. This is now fixed, with the release of a brand new Office 2.0 Database, with its own domain name. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Office 2.0 Database created almost a year ago now contains over 450 applications, which have been submitted by more than 150 contributors. It started as a single page separate from the core <span class="caps">IT</span>|Redux blog, then evolved into a collection of pages, but did not offer the ability for readers to write reviews. This is now fixed, with the release of a brand new Office 2.0 Database, with its own domain name.&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/comment-page-1/#comment-55025</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/#comment-55025</guid>
		<description>"At this point, I can only think of one thing that is really missing: the ability to publish a form that would allow any user to create new entries, without having access to any other data, much like jotForm and Wufoo do it. I hope that such a feature will be added in the future, and in the meantime I created a simple Office 2.0 Directory Entry form with Wufoo that will allow anyone to submit new applications to the database. Awesome!"

Nenest does exactly this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="dquo"><span class="dquo">&#8220;</span></span>At this point, I can only think of one thing that is really missing: the ability to publish a form that would allow any user to create new entries, without having access to any other data, much like jotForm and Wufoo do it. I hope that such a feature will be added in the future, and in the meantime I created a simple Office 2.0 Directory Entry form with Wufoo that will allow anyone to submit new applications to the database.&nbsp;Awesome!&#8221;</p>
<p>Nenest does exactly&nbsp;this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT&#124;Redux &#187; Scorecard</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/comment-page-1/#comment-31086</link>
		<dc:creator>IT&#124;Redux &#187; Scorecard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/#comment-31086</guid>
		<description>[...] Office 2.0 will become a reality: Hit Within less than nine months, the Office 2.0 Database, announced on this post, grew from nothing to over 330 applications. The concept introduced exactly a year ago got its first conference, with over 450 participants, 105 speakers, and 56 sponsors. Zoho emerged as a likely winner in the space, and ThinkFree demonstrated that web browsers are now powerful enough to support most of the features that are offered by traditional Office 1.0 productivity suites today [Disclaimer: I serve as an advisor for both companies]. Google&#8217;s release of Google Docs on the first day of the Office 2.0 Conference also gave a clear signal that things are getting serious now, and that past involvements with OpenOffice.org were just smoke and mirrors. Next year, it will be interesting to see wether Microsoft finally releases something of substance under the Office Live brand, and who gets their hands on ThinkFree. The later would be a perfect acquisition for Google, but in the meantime an OEM deal with Intuit or Salesforce.com would make a lot of sense as well. Investors might also be interested to know that the company is giving serious thoughts to the idea of raising a small round of venture funding&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Office 2.0 will become a reality: Hit Within less than nine months, the Office 2.0 Database, announced on this post, grew from nothing to over 330 applications. The concept introduced exactly a year ago got its first conference, with over 450 participants, 105 speakers, and 56 sponsors. Zoho emerged as a likely winner in the space, and ThinkFree demonstrated that web browsers are now powerful enough to support most of the features that are offered by traditional Office 1.0 productivity suites today [Disclaimer: I serve as an advisor for both companies]. Google&#8217;s release of Google Docs on the first day of the Office 2.0 Conference also gave a clear signal that things are getting serious now, and that past involvements with OpenOffice.org were just smoke and mirrors. Next year, it will be interesting to see wether Microsoft finally releases something of substance under the Office Live brand, and who gets their hands on ThinkFree. The later would be a perfect acquisition for Google, but in the meantime an <span class="caps">OEM</span> deal with Intuit or Salesforce.com would make a lot of sense as well. Investors might also be interested to know that the company is giving serious thoughts to the idea of raising a small round of venture funding&#8230;&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Chang Ghalimi</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/comment-page-1/#comment-1206</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael Chang Ghalimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 04:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/#comment-1206</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Online Flight Log...&lt;/strong&gt;

I have been using the Dabble DB online database for a couple of weeks and liked it so much that I decided to migrate my flight log to it. It&#8217;s now available online and I can update it from any computer with an Internet connection. I also added a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Online Flight&nbsp;Log&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I have been using the Dabble <span class="caps">DB</span> online database for a couple of weeks and liked it so much that I decided to migrate my flight log to it. It&#8217;s now available online and I can update it from any computer with an Internet connection. I also added&nbsp;a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Ghalimi</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/comment-page-1/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael Ghalimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>David,

Dabble DB is not yet as sophisticated, but the user interface is much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>Dabble <span class="caps">DB</span> is not yet as sophisticated, but the user interface is much&nbsp;better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Haddad</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/comment-page-1/#comment-1064</link>
		<dc:creator>David Haddad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/#comment-1064</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ismael, Dabble looks very, very exciting.  I see that Quickbase is listed in the database you created, so the obvious question is how did you like it compared to Quickbase?  I can see from the screenshots that the UI appears to be much better, but how about otherwise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ismael, Dabble looks very, very exciting.  I see that Quickbase is listed in the database you created, so the obvious question is how did you like it compared to Quickbase?  I can see from the screenshots that the <span class="caps">UI</span> appears to be much better, but how about&nbsp;otherwise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Ghalimi</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/comment-page-1/#comment-1054</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael Ghalimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/#comment-1054</guid>
		<description>Patrick,

Thanks for the kind feedback. I will look into the problem you're describing, in the meantime, all you have to do is copy and paste the &lt;a href="http://itredux.com/blog/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/trackback/" rel="nofollow"&gt;trackback URL&lt;/a&gt;, which is the same as the one used for the 'Trackback this post' link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick,</p>
<p>Thanks for the kind feedback. I will look into the problem you&#8217;re describing, in the meantime, all you have to do is copy and paste the <a href="http://itredux.com/blog/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/trackback/" rel="nofollow">trackback <span class="caps">URL</span></a>, which is the same as the one used for the &#8216;Trackback this post&#8217;&nbsp;link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Cormier</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/comment-page-1/#comment-1024</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Cormier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 05:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/03/28/office-20-directory/#comment-1024</guid>
		<description>Hi Ismael,

Great post! Thanks in particular for taking the time to publish your Office 2.0 Directory. I tried to trackback, but FYI, the "Trackback to this post" link does not work -- it generates an error.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi&nbsp;Ismael,</p>
<p>Great post! Thanks in particular for taking the time to publish your Office 2.0 Directory. I tried to trackback, but <span class="caps">FYI</span>, the &#8220;Trackback to this post&#8221; link does not work&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;it generates an&nbsp;error.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
