<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dabble DB gets JSON</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itredux.com/2006/04/22/dabble-db-gets-json/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itredux.com/2006/04/22/dabble-db-gets-json/</link>
	<description>New Rules for a New IT World</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Smallthought</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/04/22/dabble-db-gets-json/comment-page-1/#comment-1394</link>
		<dc:creator>Smallthought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 04:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/04/22/dabble-db-gets-json/#comment-1394</guid>
		<description>[...] Along with the private databases we expected, it&#8217;s also interesting to see some public uses emerging. Ismael Ghalimi&#8217;s Office 2.0 Database is an exported view of a Dabble application that lists and categorizes web-based productivity tools. He&#8217;s also integrated data feeds from Dabble deep into his IT&#124;Redux blog, seamlessly populating the Office 2.0 Setup sidebar and the list of contributors to the database. He describes this a little further here and here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Along with the private databases we expected, it&#8217;s also interesting to see some public uses emerging. Ismael Ghalimi&#8217;s Office 2.0 Database is an exported view of a Dabble application that lists and categorizes web-based productivity tools. He&#8217;s also integrated data feeds from Dabble deep into his <span class="caps">IT</span>|Redux blog, seamlessly populating the Office 2.0 Setup sidebar and the list of contributors to the database. He describes this a little further here and here.&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Ghalimi</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/04/22/dabble-db-gets-json/comment-page-1/#comment-1390</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael Ghalimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/04/22/dabble-db-gets-json/#comment-1390</guid>
		<description>Dennis,

I agree with you, tags are usually more user-intuitive than hierarchies. That being said, end-users have developed a fair level of comfort with hierarchical folders, and having to give them away is not always easy, as was experienced by some Gmail early adopters. I tend to believe that both will be needed, at least during some transition period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis,</p>
<p>I agree with you, tags are usually more user-intuitive than hierarchies. That being said, end-users have developed a fair level of comfort with hierarchical folders, and having to give them away is not always easy, as was experienced by some Gmail early adopters. I tend to believe that both will be needed, at least during some transition&nbsp;period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis howlett</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/04/22/dabble-db-gets-json/comment-page-1/#comment-1386</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/04/22/dabble-db-gets-json/#comment-1386</guid>
		<description>I don't have your technical smarts, but isn't the point of Dabble DB that you use tags rather than develop hierarchies? Doesn't tagging give users a more intuitive way of accessing the information they really need? Having said that, I can see a case for tag systems that reflect hierarchies but which serve as signposts for the information in which users are interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have your technical smarts, but isn&#8217;t the point of Dabble <span class="caps">DB</span> that you use tags rather than develop hierarchies? Doesn&#8217;t tagging give users a more intuitive way of accessing the information they really need? Having said that, I can see a case for tag systems that reflect hierarchies but which serve as signposts for the information in which users are&nbsp;interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
