<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making BPM Sound Cool Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itredux.com/2006/05/14/making-bpm-sound-cool-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itredux.com/2006/05/14/making-bpm-sound-cool-again/</link>
	<description>New Rules for a New IT World</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: BPMS Watch</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/05/14/making-bpm-sound-cool-again/#comment-4755</link>
		<dc:creator>BPMS Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/05/14/making-bpm-sound-again/#comment-4755</guid>
		<description>[...] One of the trends I detected at the Brainstorm BPM Conference in San Francisco this week is an effort to make BPM more engaging to users via Web 2.0 and Ajax.  This dovetails with Ismael&#8217;s suggestions about how to make BPM cool again. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] One of the trends I detected at the Brainstorm <span class="caps">BPM</span> Conference in San Francisco this week is an effort to make <span class="caps">BPM</span> more engaging to users via Web 2.0 and Ajax.  This dovetails with Ismael&#8217;s suggestions about how to make <span class="caps">BPM</span> cool again.&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Ghalimi</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/05/14/making-bpm-sound-cool-again/#comment-2451</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael Ghalimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 17:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/05/14/making-bpm-sound-again/#comment-2451</guid>
		<description>Howard,

I won't give up, I'm a believer. Sorry...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard,</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t give up, I&#8217;m a believer.&nbsp;Sorry&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Smith</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/05/14/making-bpm-sound-cool-again/#comment-2446</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 14:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/05/14/making-bpm-sound-again/#comment-2446</guid>
		<description>BPM is a business discipline. It does not have to be cool, even if it can be supported by a BPMS toolset. SOA is just CORBA reborn, which might be cool to the tech industry. It is not cool to business people, just confusing. When will the tech industry learn this lesson? As for "mash-ups", that just a name for a PROCESS, which a BPMS can do very well. Does that make a BPMS cool again? No. Only things with sexy names like mash-ups can be cool, especially if they are vaguely defined. Give up on the idea that BPM must be cool again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="caps">BPM</span> is a business discipline. It does not have to be cool, even if it can be supported by a <span class="caps">BPMS</span> toolset. <span class="caps">SOA</span> is just <span class="caps">CORBA</span> reborn, which might be cool to the tech industry. It is not cool to business people, just confusing. When will the tech industry learn this lesson? As for &#8220;mash-ups&#8221;, that just a name for a <span class="caps">PROCESS</span>, which a <span class="caps">BPMS</span> can do very well. Does that make a <span class="caps">BPMS</span> cool again? No. Only things with sexy names like mash-ups can be cool, especially if they are vaguely defined. Give up on the idea that <span class="caps">BPM</span> must be cool&nbsp;again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Ghalimi</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/05/14/making-bpm-sound-cool-again/#comment-2287</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael Ghalimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 18:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/05/14/making-bpm-sound-again/#comment-2287</guid>
		<description>Sandy,

I agree with you, EAI and enterprise mashups are not the same and represent both ends of a wide spectrum today. Nevertheless, I tend to believe that technologies supporting enterprise mashups will slowly but surely evolve toward a solid Service Oriented Architecture, and I expect both to be indistinguishable down the road. How long it will take is just a matter of personal faith.

Much the same happened for SOA by the way: the first version of XML-RPC was a joke compared to IIOP five or six years ago. Then came SOAP and WSDL, soon followed by a host of Web Services specifications that together provide a much more solid foundation than CORBA ever managed to offer.

Simplicity early on in the adoption process is what makes it work in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy,</p>
<p>I agree with you, <span class="caps">EAI</span> and enterprise mashups are not the same and represent both ends of a wide spectrum today. Nevertheless, I tend to believe that technologies supporting enterprise mashups will slowly but surely evolve toward a solid Service Oriented Architecture, and I expect both to be indistinguishable down the road. How long it will take is just a matter of personal&nbsp;faith.</p>
<p>Much the same happened for <span class="caps">SOA</span> by the way: the first version of <span class="caps">XML</span>-<span class="caps">RPC</span> was a joke compared to <span class="caps">IIOP</span> five or six years ago. Then came <span class="caps">SOAP</span> and <span class="caps">WSDL</span>, soon followed by a host of Web Services specifications that together provide a much more solid foundation than <span class="caps">CORBA</span> ever managed to&nbsp;offer.</p>
<p>Simplicity early on in the adoption process is what makes it work in the&nbsp;end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Kemsley</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/05/14/making-bpm-sound-cool-again/#comment-2286</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Kemsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 18:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/05/14/making-bpm-sound-again/#comment-2286</guid>
		<description>It's more than just words: although mashups and EAI are both in the integration space, they're at the opposite ends of the spectrum. Mashups are purely web-based, and often pay little or no heed to standards, although many are starting to use microformats within HTML pages to aid in parsing the data. All of the mashups that I've seen combined data from multiple third-party sources and present it to a user for interaction. EAI, on the other hand (or SOA or web services or whatever else that you want to put at that end of the spectrum) is much more likely to be standards-based as we move towards SOAP and other web services standards for interfacing applications (including wrapping legacy applications) within an enterprise, and often is a pure system-to-system exchange of data.

Yes, they're both integration, but you can't just glibly replace the word "EAI" with "mashup" and expect to be taken seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s more than just words: although mashups and <span class="caps">EAI</span> are both in the integration space, they&#8217;re at the opposite ends of the spectrum. Mashups are purely web-based, and often pay little or no heed to standards, although many are starting to use microformats within <span class="caps">HTML</span> pages to aid in parsing the data. All of the mashups that I&#8217;ve seen combined data from multiple third-party sources and present it to a user for interaction. <span class="caps">EAI</span>, on the other hand (or <span class="caps">SOA</span> or web services or whatever else that you want to put at that end of the spectrum) is much more likely to be standards-based as we move towards <span class="caps">SOAP</span> and other web services standards for interfacing applications (including wrapping legacy applications) within an enterprise, and often is a pure system-to-system exchange of&nbsp;data.</p>
<p>Yes, they&#8217;re both integration, but you can&#8217;t just glibly replace the word &#8220;<span class="caps">EAI</span>&#8221; with &#8220;mashup&#8221; and expect to be taken&nbsp;seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Gilbert</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/05/14/making-bpm-sound-cool-again/#comment-2261</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Gilbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 03:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/05/14/making-bpm-sound-again/#comment-2261</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;"Hey, that Salieri guy's Google numbers are way up! Mozart must suck."...&lt;/strong&gt;

What it must have been like when instant gratification wasn't so instant... I have been trying to find the exact quote that's attributed to Bill Gates about how technology always takes longer to catch on than you first expect, ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><span class="dquo"><span class="dquo">&#8220;</span></span>Hey, that Salieri guy&#8217;s Google numbers are way up! Mozart must&nbsp;suck.&#8221;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>What it must have been like when instant gratification wasn&#8217;t so instant&#8230; I have been trying to find the exact quote that&#8217;s attributed to Bill Gates about how technology always takes longer to catch on than you first expect,&nbsp;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
