<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too Many Gateways</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itredux.com/2006/05/28/too-many-gateways/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itredux.com/2006/05/28/too-many-gateways/</link>
	<description>New Rules for a New IT World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:04:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Practical Blogging</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/05/28/too-many-gateways/comment-page-1/#comment-3451</link>
		<dc:creator>Practical Blogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 17:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/05/28/too-many-gateways/#comment-3451</guid>
		<description>[...] With the ability for customers and prospects to connect and build networks and communities, are Corporate Marketing Departments, even relevent? If possible, what can corporate marketing departents do to stay relevent? We explore this issue from multiple sides and issues â€“dial in to hear. Too many gateways mean we all end up with far too much information to keep up with. When a beta tester and geek like Ismael Ghalimi ends up getting frustrated, then you know itâ€™s time for Identity 2.0. Rather than having to keep up with 30+ passwords/logins and having to worry about APIs and the technical specifics of multiple platforms, Identity 2.0 would streamline all of this into one gateway that shared your data with the applications you allowed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] With the ability for customers and prospects to connect and build networks and communities, are Corporate Marketing Departments, even relevent? If possible, what can corporate marketing departents do to stay relevent? We explore this issue from multiple sides and issues â€“dial in to hear. Too many gateways mean we all end up with far too much information to keep up with. When a beta tester and geek like Ismael Ghalimi ends up getting frustrated, then you know itâ€™s time for Identity 2.0. Rather than having to keep up with 30+ passwords/logins and having to worry about APIs and the technical specifics of multiple platforms, Identity 2.0 would streamline all of this into one gateway that shared your data with the applications you allowed.&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Ghalimi</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/05/28/too-many-gateways/comment-page-1/#comment-3100</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael Ghalimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 01:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/05/28/too-many-gateways/#comment-3100</guid>
		<description>Dennis,

I must agree with you. The service aggregators have it easier. Much easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis,</p>
<p>I must agree with you. The service aggregators have it easier. Much&nbsp;easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D. McDonald</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/05/28/too-many-gateways/comment-page-1/#comment-3094</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D. McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 20:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/05/28/too-many-gateways/#comment-3094</guid>
		<description>Ismael:

I don&#039;t think this &quot;too many gateways&quot; problem is ever going to be solved. It&#039;s not just the issue of technical translation and standards to consider, it&#039;s also the issue of making inevitable version-control and upgrade issues manageable across applications by people like me and my wife who hate having to &quot;work under the hood.&quot; 

The evidence that things have already gone too far is the numerous web pages that are festooned with badges, browser download buttons, and a bewildering variety of feed management options. What that situation suggests to me is that, in the real world of the World Wild Web, things are getting harder to manage, not easier. 

This is &quot;playing into the hands of&quot; large services (Yahoo, Google, large system integrators) who have it in their power to enforce some consistency and ease of use standards. That&#039;s good for some users, not so good for others.

And I thought the world was getting flatter and simpler!

- Dennis

PS: I address some of these issues &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ddmcd.com/doodads.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ismael:</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think this &#8220;too many gateways&#8221; problem is ever going to be solved. It&#8217;s not just the issue of technical translation and standards to consider, it&#8217;s also the issue of making inevitable version-control and upgrade issues manageable across applications by people like me and my wife who hate having to &#8220;work under the&nbsp;hood.&#8221; </p>
<p>The evidence that things have already gone too far is the numerous web pages that are festooned with badges, browser download buttons, and a bewildering variety of feed management options. What that situation suggests to me is that, in the real world of the World Wild Web, things are getting harder to manage, not&nbsp;easier. </p>
<p>This is &#8220;playing into the hands of&#8221; large services (Yahoo, Google, large system integrators) who have it in their power to enforce some consistency and ease of use standards. That&#8217;s good for some users, not so good for&nbsp;others.</p>
<p>And I thought the world was getting flatter and&nbsp;simpler!</p>
<p>-&nbsp;Dennis</p>
<p><span class="caps">PS</span>: I address some of these issues&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ddmcd.com/doodads.html">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myles Braithwaite</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/05/28/too-many-gateways/comment-page-1/#comment-3089</link>
		<dc:creator>Myles Braithwaite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/05/28/too-many-gateways/#comment-3089</guid>
		<description>I have the same problem: one application piggybacking on another one, be it online, on a server, or on the desktop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the same problem: one application piggybacking on another one, be it online, on a server, or on the&nbsp;desktop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Wood</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2006/05/28/too-many-gateways/comment-page-1/#comment-3083</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2006/05/28/too-many-gateways/#comment-3083</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget, you also use an RSS-to-iCal gateway. This is how Spanning Salesforce&#039;s iCal support is implemented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget, you also use an <span class="caps">RSS</span>-to-iCal gateway. This is how Spanning Salesforce&#8217;s iCal support is&nbsp;implemented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
