<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Office 2.0 Setup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itredux.com/2007/02/13/your-office-20-setup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itredux.com/2007/02/13/your-office-20-setup/</link>
	<description>New Rules for a New IT World</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Weblog of Quests</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/02/13/your-office-20-setup/#comment-355690</link>
		<dc:creator>Weblog of Quests</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/02/13/your-office-20-setup/#comment-355690</guid>
		<description>[...] For those of us dealing with Information Technology daily, the web is an indispensable source of information. However, apart from Gmail, many people may be unaware the availability of many Web 2.0 applications - some free, others using a subscription model - which basically will allow us to work from anywhere as long as we have access to a web browser. Well, here is a good list of Office 2.0 setup. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] For those of us dealing with Information Technology daily, the web is an indispensable source of information. However, apart from Gmail, many people may be unaware the availability of many Web 2.0 applications - some free, others using a subscription model - which basically will allow us to work from anywhere as long as we have access to a web browser. Well, here is a good list of Office 2.0 setup.&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solunas</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/02/13/your-office-20-setup/#comment-75806</link>
		<dc:creator>Solunas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 18:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/02/13/your-office-20-setup/#comment-75806</guid>
		<description>I wonder if anyone can help me? I'm looking for a webtop solution for a small business. They need an online scheduling &#38; CRM solution with QuickBooks integration. The scheduler would have to have a client access point as well, easily interface with her web site, and on the administrative end be able to handle some rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if anyone can help me? I&#8217;m looking for a webtop solution for a small business. They need an online scheduling <span class="amp">&amp;</span> <span class="caps">CRM</span> solution with QuickBooks integration. The scheduler would have to have a client access point as well, easily interface with her web site, and on the administrative end be able to handle some&nbsp;rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT&#124;Redux</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/02/13/your-office-20-setup/#comment-63139</link>
		<dc:creator>IT&#124;Redux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 15:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/02/13/your-office-20-setup/#comment-63139</guid>
		<description>[...] Final results will be announced next week on Your Office 2.0 Setup and as an update to this post. In the meantime, please help me build next week&#8217;s roundup on Weblogs. You can use this form courtesy of Wufoo for suggesting new applications, or providing additional information about existing ones. I would also welcome ideas for domain-specific criteria that could be used for evaluating the players on our list. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Final results will be announced next week on Your Office 2.0 Setup and as an update to this post. In the meantime, please help me build next week&#8217;s roundup on Weblogs. You can use this form courtesy of Wufoo for suggesting new applications, or providing additional information about existing ones. I would also welcome ideas for domain-specific criteria that could be used for evaluating the players on our list.&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT&#124;Redux</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/02/13/your-office-20-setup/#comment-59951</link>
		<dc:creator>IT&#124;Redux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 20:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/02/13/your-office-20-setup/#comment-59951</guid>
		<description>[...] Final results will be announced next week on Your Office 2.0 Setup and as an update to this post. In the meantime, please help me build next week&#8217;s roundup on Spreadsheet editors. You can use this form courtesy of Wufoo for suggesting new applications, or providing additional information about existing ones. I would also welcome ideas for domain-specific criteria that could be used for evaluating the players on our list. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Final results will be announced next week on Your Office 2.0 Setup and as an update to this post. In the meantime, please help me build next week&#8217;s roundup on Spreadsheet editors. You can use this form courtesy of Wufoo for suggesting new applications, or providing additional information about existing ones. I would also welcome ideas for domain-specific criteria that could be used for evaluating the players on our list.&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT&#124;Redux</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/02/13/your-office-20-setup/#comment-56451</link>
		<dc:creator>IT&#124;Redux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/02/13/your-office-20-setup/#comment-56451</guid>
		<description>[...] Final results will be announced next week on Your Office 2.0 Setup and as an update to this post. In the meantime, please help me build next week&#8217;s roundup on Presentation tools. You can use this form courtesy of Wufoo for suggesting new applications, or providing additional information about existing ones. I would also welcome ideas for domain-specific criteria that could be used for evaluating the players on our list. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Final results will be announced next week on Your Office 2.0 Setup and as an update to this post. In the meantime, please help me build next week&#8217;s roundup on Presentation tools. You can use this form courtesy of Wufoo for suggesting new applications, or providing additional information about existing ones. I would also welcome ideas for domain-specific criteria that could be used for evaluating the players on our list.&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT&#124;Redux</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/02/13/your-office-20-setup/#comment-52415</link>
		<dc:creator>IT&#124;Redux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/02/13/your-office-20-setup/#comment-52415</guid>
		<description>[...] Final results will be announced next week on Your Office 2.0 Setup and as an update to this post. In the meantime, please help me build next week&#8217;s roundup on Email. You can use this form courtesy of Wufoo for suggesting new applications, or providing additional information about existing ones. I would also welcome ideas for domain-specific criteria that could be used for evaluating the players on our list. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Final results will be announced next week on Your Office 2.0 Setup and as an update to this post. In the meantime, please help me build next week&#8217;s roundup on Email. You can use this form courtesy of Wufoo for suggesting new applications, or providing additional information about existing ones. I would also welcome ideas for domain-specific criteria that could be used for evaluating the players on our list.&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venture Chronicles</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/02/13/your-office-20-setup/#comment-47009</link>
		<dc:creator>Venture Chronicles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/02/13/your-office-20-setup/#comment-47009</guid>
		<description>[...] Ismael&#8217;s post on office 2.0 setups is a roadmap of sorts... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Ismael&#8217;s post on office 2.0 setups is a roadmap of sorts&#8230;&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Ghalimi</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/02/13/your-office-20-setup/#comment-46623</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael Ghalimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/02/13/your-office-20-setup/#comment-46623</guid>
		<description>Andy,

Lots of interesting ideas there. I will put together some of these surveys once we get a quarter or two of weekly roundups done. That way, we should get enough votes to make it statistically relevant. For information, Zoho Polls uses IP addresses to ensure that only one vote is recorded per user. There must be ways to trick the system, but I'm not too worried about it right now. It's not like we're conducting the election for the next U.S. president...

Take care
-Ismael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,</p>
<p>Lots of interesting ideas there. I will put together some of these surveys once we get a quarter or two of weekly roundups done. That way, we should get enough votes to make it statistically relevant. For information, Zoho Polls uses <span class="caps">IP</span> addresses to ensure that only one vote is recorded per user. There must be ways to trick the system, but I&#8217;m not too worried about it right now. It&#8217;s not like we&#8217;re conducting the election for the next U.S.&nbsp;president&#8230;</p>
<p>Take care<br />&nbsp;-Ismael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Baldwin</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/02/13/your-office-20-setup/#comment-46499</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Baldwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/02/13/your-office-20-setup/#comment-46499</guid>
		<description>Ismael,

At the risk of introducing scope creep—but at least it's early before too much data has been gathered—can I suggest the following questions and approaches?

1. Which type of application do you use (Bookmark, CRM, Word Processor, etc.)?
&#160;&#160;a. Daily
&#160;&#160;b. Two or Three times a week
&#160;&#160;c. Weekly
&#160;&#160;d. Rarely
&#160;&#160;e. Never

2. How do you or would you like to use Office 2.0 tools?
&#160;&#160;a. Purely on line
&#160;&#160;b. Mixed on/offline with online storage
&#160;&#160;c. On/offline with local storage

3. How important is it that data is stored in an open, standard format?

I feel that this would help guide application developers, and also help normalize the scoring. For example, does the fact that there were 60 respondents to bookmarking and 8 for contacts implies that bookmarking is more developed/popular/widely known than contacts, or is it just that bookmarkers are more opinionated in their choice of tools than laid back contact managers?

It would be an interesting exercise to manage the questionnaire via Dabble DB or Zoho—not sure how you'd ensure one person one vote, but this can be an exercise for the reader.

No doubt others would propose extra questions—perhaps we need a meta-poll (what question would you like to ask), plus some taxonomy to group suggestions down for a simpler voting mechanism.

Now I'll stop acting as a customer (always wanting more), and get back into my developer box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ismael,</p>
<p>At the risk of introducing scope creep—but at least it&#8217;s early before too much data has been gathered—can I suggest the following questions and&nbsp;approaches?</p>
<p>1. Which type of application do you use (Bookmark, <span class="caps">CRM</span>, Word Processor, etc.)?<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;a. Daily<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;b. Two or Three times a week<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;c. Weekly<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;d. Rarely<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;e.&nbsp;Never</p>
<p>2. How do you or would you like to use Office 2.0 tools?<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;a. Purely on line<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;b. Mixed on/offline with online storage<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;c. On/offline with local&nbsp;storage</p>
<p>3. How important is it that data is stored in an open, standard&nbsp;format?</p>
<p>I feel that this would help guide application developers, and also help normalize the scoring. For example, does the fact that there were 60 respondents to bookmarking and 8 for contacts implies that bookmarking is more developed/popular/widely known than contacts, or is it just that bookmarkers are more opinionated in their choice of tools than laid back contact&nbsp;managers?</p>
<p>It would be an interesting exercise to manage the questionnaire via Dabble <span class="caps">DB</span> or Zoho—not sure how you&#8217;d ensure one person one vote, but this can be an exercise for the&nbsp;reader.</p>
<p>No doubt others would propose extra questions—perhaps we need a meta-poll (what question would you like to ask), plus some taxonomy to group suggestions down for a simpler voting&nbsp;mechanism.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;ll stop acting as a customer (always wanting more), and get back into my developer&nbsp;box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
