<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Email Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itredux.com/2007/03/05/email-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itredux.com/2007/03/05/email-roundup/</link>
	<description>New Rules for a New IT World</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 02:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: IT&#124;Redux - Your Office 2.0 Setup</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-59447</link>
		<dc:creator>IT&#124;Redux - Your Office 2.0 Setup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-59447</guid>
		<description>[...] 1. Webmail.us (61 votes out of 110)&#160;[Roundup] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 1. Webmail.us (61 votes out of 110)&nbsp;[Roundup]&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Ip</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-56242</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Ip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 03:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-56242</guid>
		<description>NIST did the right thing to ban IE7, Vista, and Office 2007 for now. Vista has not yet been C2 certified! IE7 and Office 2007 are more XML compliant, and therefore less secured. That is natural.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="caps">NIST</span> did the right thing to ban <span class="caps">IE7</span>, Vista, and Office 2007 for now. Vista has not yet been C2 certified! <span class="caps">IE7</span> and Office 2007 are more <span class="caps">XML</span> compliant, and therefore less secured. That is&nbsp;natural.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Ghalimi</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-56197</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael Ghalimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-56197</guid>
		<description>Francis,

I see, you're talking about Zoho Virtual Office, which has been renamed Zoho Mail recently. This is the only piece of the Zoho collection that can be deployed on premise, and as far as I can tell, it works well with IE 6 and FireFox. The fact that it does not work with IE 7 is due to the fact that IE 7 does not work at all. The problem does not come from Zoho, it comes from Microsoft. And I am not the only one thinking so. The National Institute of Standards and Technologies (NIST) recently &lt;a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=198000229" rel="nofollow"&gt;banned&lt;/a&gt; not only IE 7, but also Vista and Office 2007, mainly for security reasons. So Francis, I love standards as much as you do, and I believe in the need for secure software as much as you do, but please, do not give us Microsoft as an example of standards-based and secure software. Please.

Best regards
-Ismael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Francis,</p>
<p>I see, you&#8217;re talking about Zoho Virtual Office, which has been renamed Zoho Mail recently. This is the only piece of the Zoho collection that can be deployed on premise, and as far as I can tell, it works well with <span class="caps">IE</span> 6 and FireFox. The fact that it does not work with <span class="caps">IE</span> 7 is due to the fact that <span class="caps">IE</span> 7 does not work at all. The problem does not come from Zoho, it comes from Microsoft. And I am not the only one thinking so. The National Institute of Standards and Technologies (<span class="caps">NIST</span>) recently <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=198000229" rel="nofollow">banned</a> not only <span class="caps">IE</span> 7, but also Vista and Office 2007, mainly for security reasons. So Francis, I love standards as much as you do, and I believe in the need for secure software as much as you do, but please, do not give us Microsoft as an example of standards-based and secure software.&nbsp;Please.</p>
<p>Best regards<br />&nbsp;-Ismael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Ip</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-55310</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Ip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 14:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-55310</guid>
		<description>What you said is not true. Zoho has an option to install and run its suite on an organization's own server, rather than on Zoho's facilities. I installed and reinstalled it a total of 3 times, and tested it against IE (6 and 7) and FireFox. In addition to its OS characteristics I reported earlier, Zoho's applications behaved very differently within each browser. It didn't even work with IE 7. It was supposed to be browser and server neutral—a requirement of Office 2.0 or Web 2.0! Does it matter if a package runs on the vendor's facilities or an organization's own server?

I've been looking into Microsoft's Office Live Premium, not extensively yet. It is an on-demand service that comes with domain registration, 50 e-mail accounts with 2 GB of storage each, office suite including project management, on-line collaboration with audio and video soon, CRM, ECM, web hosting, tools to build web sites &#38; workflow, and application hosting, with a free accounting package for small business. All of these are at a cost of $39.95 a month. This is a heck of lot cheaper than subscribing to many independent services, which one needs to spend time to integrate! Moreover, there is a fallback position when a user cannot go online: s/he can use Microsoft's Office Suite, or even OpenOffice.org, to work on documents.

Microsoft has been working with Nortel in providing hardware and software for Voice over IP and Internet teleconferencing. I have a friend, a professional engineer, who used to work for Nortel as Corporate Network Manager. Nortel tests all its products internally before it sells the equipments to the customers.

Don't get me wrong, I am not against Office 2.0, Web 2.0, or Enterprise 2.0. Personally, I rather like them. They have the potential to improve software-based systems. I, however, would not recommend a product or service to my clients when it is half baked (e.g. BPMS with no EDI capabilities), or doesn't conform to de jure standards (e.g. not C2 certifiable) such as: ISO, IEEE, ANSI, EIA, and what not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you said is not true. Zoho has an option to install and run its suite on an organization&#8217;s own server, rather than on Zoho&#8217;s facilities. I installed and reinstalled it a total of 3 times, and tested it against <span class="caps">IE</span> (6 and 7) and FireFox. In addition to its <span class="caps">OS</span> characteristics I reported earlier, Zoho&#8217;s applications behaved very differently within each browser. It didn&#8217;t even work with <span class="caps">IE</span> 7. It was supposed to be browser and server neutral—a requirement of Office 2.0 or Web 2.0! Does it matter if a package runs on the vendor&#8217;s facilities or an organization&#8217;s own&nbsp;server?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been looking into Microsoft&#8217;s Office Live Premium, not extensively yet. It is an on-demand service that comes with domain registration, 50 e-mail accounts with 2 <span class="caps">GB</span> of storage each, office suite including project management, on-line collaboration with audio and video soon, <span class="caps">CRM</span>, <span class="caps">ECM</span>, web hosting, tools to build web sites <span class="amp">&amp;</span> workflow, and application hosting, with a free accounting package for small business. All of these are at a cost of $39.95 a month. This is a heck of lot cheaper than subscribing to many independent services, which one needs to spend time to integrate! Moreover, there is a fallback position when a user cannot go online: s/he can use Microsoft&#8217;s Office Suite, or even OpenOffice.org, to work on&nbsp;documents.</p>
<p>Microsoft has been working with Nortel in providing hardware and software for Voice over <span class="caps">IP</span> and Internet teleconferencing. I have a friend, a professional engineer, who used to work for Nortel as Corporate Network Manager. Nortel tests all its products internally before it sells the equipments to the&nbsp;customers.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I am not against Office 2.0, Web 2.0, or Enterprise 2.0. Personally, I rather like them. They have the potential to improve software-based systems. I, however, would not recommend a product or service to my clients when it is half baked (e.g. <span class="caps">BPMS</span> with no <span class="caps">EDI</span> capabilities), or doesn&#8217;t conform to de jure standards (e.g. not C2 certifiable) such as: <span class="caps">ISO</span>, <span class="caps">IEEE</span>, <span class="caps">ANSI</span>, <span class="caps">EIA</span>, and what&nbsp;not!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Ghalimi</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-55175</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael Ghalimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 04:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-55175</guid>
		<description>Francis,

With all due respect, this makes no sense at all. Zoho's applications were never designed to run offline, and claiming that they don't does not mean anything. It's like saying that Google's search engine is no good when working offline. I'm sorry, but this is complete non-sense.

-Ismael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Francis,</p>
<p>With all due respect, this makes no sense at all. Zoho&#8217;s applications were never designed to run offline, and claiming that they don&#8217;t does not mean anything. It&#8217;s like saying that Google&#8217;s search engine is no good when working offline. I&#8217;m sorry, but this is complete&nbsp;non-sense.</p>
<p>-Ismael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Ghalimi</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-55174</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael Ghalimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 04:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-55174</guid>
		<description>Jeremy,

Thanks for the tip. It's already filed under the Group Manager category.

Best regards
-Ismael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy,</p>
<p>Thanks for the tip. It&#8217;s already filed under the Group Manager&nbsp;category.</p>
<p>Best regards<br />&nbsp;-Ismael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Ip</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-54668</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Ip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-54668</guid>
		<description>Zoli,

That was exactly what I did.

I don't take anyone's word on how fantastic a package runs, be it online or offline!

Best regards
-Francis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zoli,</p>
<p>That was exactly what I&nbsp;did.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t take anyone&#8217;s word on how fantastic a package runs, be it online or&nbsp;offline!</p>
<p>Best regards<br />&nbsp;-Francis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Hunter</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-54559</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-54559</guid>
		<description>Ismael,

If you are inclined, please take a look at &lt;a href="http://www.bluetie.com/"&gt;BlueTie&lt;/a&gt;. I believe it would provide a good addition to your Database (Alexa 29,708, Google 5). BlueTie has a competitive set of features to many of the products you listed, and a compelling price offer. Integration with a CRM is not yet there, but we do have the ability to have emails archived to CD and sent to you. 

Regards
-Jeremy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ismael,</p>
<p>If you are inclined, please take a look at <a href="http://www.bluetie.com/">BlueTie</a>. I believe it would provide a good addition to your Database (Alexa 29,708, Google 5). BlueTie has a competitive set of features to many of the products you listed, and a compelling price offer. Integration with a <span class="caps">CRM</span> is not yet there, but we do have the ability to have emails archived to <span class="caps">CD</span> and sent to&nbsp;you. </p>
<p>Regards<br />&nbsp;-Jeremy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoli Erdos</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-54547</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoli Erdos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 12:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-54547</guid>
		<description>Francis,

Then you know something nobody else does.

I'm sure the Zoho folks will be happy to learn their applications run offline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Francis,</p>
<p>Then you know something nobody else&nbsp;does.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure the Zoho folks will be happy to learn their applications run&nbsp;offline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Ip</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-54513</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Ip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-54513</guid>
		<description>I was not talking about running Zoho with a web browser on the Internet. I was talking about running Zoho offline as an office suite! We are talking apples and oranges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was not talking about running Zoho with a web browser on the Internet. I was talking about running Zoho offline as an office suite! We are talking apples and&nbsp;oranges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Ghalimi</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-54272</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael Ghalimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-54272</guid>
		<description>Francis,

I have been using Zoho for more than a year now, and I have never experienced such a thing, neither on Microsoft Windows nor on Mac OS X. Sometimes, the web browser might freeze, but this is true for virtually any website that makes heavy use of JavaScript. Other than that, I think you are painting a picture that is not a faithful depiction of the reality.

Best regards
-Ismael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Francis,</p>
<p>I have been using Zoho for more than a year now, and I have never experienced such a thing, neither on Microsoft Windows nor on Mac <span class="caps">OS</span> X. Sometimes, the web browser might freeze, but this is true for virtually any website that makes heavy use of JavaScript. Other than that, I think you are painting a picture that is not a faithful depiction of the&nbsp;reality.</p>
<p>Best regards<br />&nbsp;-Ismael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Ip</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-54261</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Ip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-54261</guid>
		<description>Zoho does exhibit a few characteristics of an operating system. The applications of Zoho run totally within Zoho's own space. When an application gets into an infinite loop, killng the whole Zoho workspace is the only way to terminate the run away application. Moreover, Zoho monopolizes the CPU in start-up processes, and there is no way to terminate it when it gets into an infinite loop. Switching off the PC and rebooting are the only means to reclaim your PC—very similar to the notorious Windows Blue screen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zoho does exhibit a few characteristics of an operating system. The applications of Zoho run totally within Zoho&#8217;s own space. When an application gets into an infinite loop, killng the whole Zoho workspace is the only way to terminate the run away application. Moreover, Zoho monopolizes the <span class="caps">CPU</span> in start-up processes, and there is no way to terminate it when it gets into an infinite loop. Switching off the <span class="caps">PC</span> and rebooting are the only means to reclaim your <span class="caps">PC</span>—very similar to the notorious Windows Blue&nbsp;screen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Ghalimi</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-54245</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael Ghalimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-54245</guid>
		<description>Zoli,

You're right, the term is a little bit confusing, but I could not find anything better. Thing is, Joyent and Zoho Virtual Office provide a lot of the tools that come standard with an Operating System, hence the choice of terminology.

I might change it down the road though.

Best regards
-Ismael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zoli,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, the term is a little bit confusing, but I could not find anything better. Thing is, Joyent and Zoho Virtual Office provide a lot of the tools that come standard with an Operating System, hence the choice of&nbsp;terminology.</p>
<p>I might change it down the road&nbsp;though.</p>
<p>Best regards<br />&nbsp;-Ismael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoli Erdos</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-53990</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoli Erdos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 01:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/blog/2007/03/05/email-roundup/#comment-53990</guid>
		<description>Ismael,

I'm surprised at what you classify as "Operating System". I don't consider Joyent or Zoho Virtual Office an OS, just like in the desktop world Outlook isn't an OS either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ismael,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised at what you classify as &#8220;Operating System&#8221;. I don&#8217;t consider Joyent or Zoho Virtual Office an <span class="caps">OS</span>, just like in the desktop world Outlook isn&#8217;t an <span class="caps">OS</span>&nbsp;either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
