<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on BPM 2.0 and CEP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itredux.com/2008/10/13/more-on-bpm-20-and-cep/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itredux.com/2008/10/13/more-on-bpm-20-and-cep/</link>
	<description>New Rules for a New IT World</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Ghalimi</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2008/10/13/more-on-bpm-20-and-cep/comment-page-1/#comment-988027</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael Ghalimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/?p=547#comment-988027</guid>
		<description>Chris,

I could not agree more.

-Ismael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>I could not agree&nbsp;more.</p>
<p>-Ismael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K. Chris Sotudeh</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2008/10/13/more-on-bpm-20-and-cep/comment-page-1/#comment-987971</link>
		<dc:creator>K. Chris Sotudeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/?p=547#comment-987971</guid>
		<description>Hi Ismael,

I'm glad that my original question about CEP and Intalio has energized such a vigorous discussion on the topic. However, I sure hope we don't go down the path of TLA (three letter acronym) warfare, which often results in "a hammer looking for a nail" and the merits of the hammer rather than truly understanding the business problem and its characteristics.

I think your characterization of looking at it from a business use-case stand-point is really the way to assess the situation as it relates to the need, the state of the technology, and the most suitable approach based on factors such as those you have mentioned above, e.g. size of data sets, volume of events and processes, structured vs. unstructured data, etc.

It is definitely an evolving landscape and, as is often the case, how the capability to address it is positioned in the technology stack (and product packaging) sometimes creates ambiguity and turmoil. I look forward to hearing more about Intalio's plans and approach in the future. Keep up the good work!

Best,
-Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi&nbsp;Ismael,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad that my original question about <span class="caps">CEP</span> and Intalio has energized such a vigorous discussion on the topic. However, I sure hope we don&#8217;t go down the path of <span class="caps">TLA</span> (three letter acronym) warfare, which often results in &#8220;a hammer looking for a nail&#8221; and the merits of the hammer rather than truly understanding the business problem and its&nbsp;characteristics.</p>
<p>I think your characterization of looking at it from a business use-case stand-point is really the way to assess the situation as it relates to the need, the state of the technology, and the most suitable approach based on factors such as those you have mentioned above, e.g. size of data sets, volume of events and processes, structured vs. unstructured data,&nbsp;etc.</p>
<p>It is definitely an evolving landscape and, as is often the case, how the capability to address it is positioned in the technology stack (and product packaging) sometimes creates ambiguity and turmoil. I look forward to hearing more about Intalio&#8217;s plans and approach in the future. Keep up the good&nbsp;work!</p>
<p>Best,<br />&nbsp;-Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
