<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Staying Connected While Traveling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itredux.com/2010/07/27/staying-connected-while-traveling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itredux.com/2010/07/27/staying-connected-while-traveling/</link>
	<description>New Rules for a New IT World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 03:24:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Ghalimi</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2010/07/27/staying-connected-while-traveling/comment-page-1/#comment-1205032</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael Ghalimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/?p=1713#comment-1205032</guid>
		<description>Keep an eye on Intalio in November. You&#039;ll be amazed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep an eye on Intalio in November. You&#8217;ll be&nbsp;amazed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Ip</title>
		<link>http://itredux.com/2010/07/27/staying-connected-while-traveling/comment-page-1/#comment-1205007</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Ip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itredux.com/?p=1713#comment-1205007</guid>
		<description>Ismael,

Long time no speak! 

GMVNO is a nice concept, it will never take place in 3 to 5 years. To start with, it needs governments of all countries to agree on a taxation protocol. For instance, Quebec has 1 out of 3 rule. That is, a cell pone with home switch in Quebec, a call originates from Quebec, or a call receives in Quebec, Quebec gets the tax of a call. For the rest of Canada, the rule is 2 out of 3.

Your Web Office is very similar to the Office 97. All applications (not just Word, Excel, and PowerPoint) could run within the IE browser. There was a server that could support collaboration over the Internet. It was ahead of its time, as there were little, if any, high band-width Internet access for individuals, other than those who could afford an ISDN line! By the way, would the Web Office support OLE?

What happened to the Office 2.0?

Cloud computing would be good only if there are enough OWL based ontologies up and running on the Internet!

Cheers
-Francis

P.S. Hmmm, you still haven&#039;t cracked into the largest market (i.e. China). I thought you would have done that in 2008! One more thing, if you wan to crack into U.S. Government agencies, DoD in particular, your software needs to be C2 certified!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ismael,</p>
<p>Long time no&nbsp;speak! </p>
<p><span class="caps">GMVNO</span> is a nice concept, it will never take place in 3 to 5 years. To start with, it needs governments of all countries to agree on a taxation protocol. For instance, Quebec has 1 out of 3 rule. That is, a cell pone with home switch in Quebec, a call originates from Quebec, or a call receives in Quebec, Quebec gets the tax of a call. For the rest of Canada, the rule is 2 out of&nbsp;3.</p>
<p>Your Web Office is very similar to the Office 97. All applications (not just Word, Excel, and PowerPoint) could run within the <span class="caps">IE</span> browser. There was a server that could support collaboration over the Internet. It was ahead of its time, as there were little, if any, high band-width Internet access for individuals, other than those who could afford an <span class="caps">ISDN</span> line! By the way, would the Web Office support&nbsp;<span class="caps">OLE</span>?</p>
<p>What happened to the Office&nbsp;2.0?</p>
<p>Cloud computing would be good only if there are enough <span class="caps">OWL</span> based ontologies up and running on the&nbsp;Internet!</p>
<p>Cheers<br />&nbsp;-Francis</p>
<p><span class="caps">P.S.</span> Hmmm, you still haven&#8217;t cracked into the largest market (i.e. China). I thought you would have done that in 2008! One more thing, if you wan to crack into <span class="caps">U.S.</span> Government agencies, DoD in particular, your software needs to be C2&nbsp;certified!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

